If you’ve ever looked into protecting your domain from spoofing or phishing, you’ve probably encountered three acronyms that seem to come up everywhere: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
At a glance, they sound similar (all are DNS-based email authentication standards) but each one solves a different problem. Understanding how they differ, and how they work together, is essential to protecting your domain and improving your email deliverability.
Let’s unpack them one by one, and then see how they combine to form a complete defensive wall against fraudulent email.
Email was designed decades ago, long before cybercrime or phishing were everyday concerns. By default, there’s nothing stopping someone from sending an email claiming to be from your domain.
Authentication standards were introduced to give mail servers a way to verify the sender’s legitimacy. SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are the most important of these.
Think of them like ID checks at different stages:
SPF (Sender Policy Framework) lets you publish a list of servers that are allowed to send emails for your domain. When someone sends a message using your domain, the recipient’s mail server compares the sending IP address against this list.
If the IP is listed, the message passes SPF. If it’s not, it fails.
Here’s what a typical SPF record looks like:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all
-all
at the end tells mail servers to reject any other source.SPF is easy to implement and provides a strong first layer of defense. But it has two main weaknesses:
In other words, SPF confirms where an email came from — but not necessarily who it came from.
DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) uses cryptographic signatures to confirm that an email hasn’t been altered in transit and that it genuinely comes from your domain.
Here’s how it functions:
If the signature matches, the email is considered authentic.
A typical DKIM record looks like this:
v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFA...
DKIM provides assurance that the message wasn’t tampered with, a huge win for integrity. However, DKIM alone doesn’t say what should happen to emails that fail verification, nor does it prevent attackers from sending messages using your domain without a valid signature.
That’s the missing policy layer that DMARC provides.
DMARC builds on SPF and DKIM to give domain owners real control. It does three things:
Alignment - It checks that the domain in the visible “From” header matches the domain authenticated by SPF or DKIM.
Policy - It tells mail servers what to do with unauthenticated messages (do nothing, send to spam, or reject).
Reporting - It gives you feedback about how your domain is being used through XML reports (RUA and RUF).
Here’s an example DMARC record:
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@yourdomain.com; pct=100
This tells recipients to quarantine any emails that fail DMARC checks, send aggregate reports to the specified address, and apply the rule to 100% of messages.
SPF and DKIM provide verification, but not enforcement. DMARC adds the missing layer of accountability by linking authentication results back to your domain’s visible identity, and by defining what action to take when something doesn’t match.
In practice, DMARC is what prevents attackers from spoofing your domain and sending convincing phishing messages “from” you. It’s also what helps you see exactly who’s sending mail in your name.
You can think of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC as a three-part safety system, with each piece covering what the others can’t.
If a message fails SPF but passes DKIM, it can still be delivered, as long as DMARC confirms that the DKIM signature aligns with the same domain in the “From” address.
If both fail, DMARC applies your chosen policy: monitor, quarantine, or reject.
This alignment mechanism is what makes DMARC so powerful. It connects the dots between the technical sender identity and the brand identity visible to recipients.
Even among experienced administrators, these protocols are sometimes mixed up. Let’s clear up a few persistent myths:
SPF alone stops spoofing.
Not true. SPF doesn’t verify the visible sender domain. Only the server that sent the message. Attackers can still forge the From field.
DKIM is optional if SPF is working.
Not really. DKIM is essential for ensuring integrity, and it helps messages survive forwarding, where SPF often fails.
DMARC is only for big organizations.
Also false. DMARC is a free, open standard. Any domain owner, from a small business to a global brand, can publish a record and gain immediate visibility.
Implementing all three is complicated.
It can seem daunting, but once SPF and DKIM are configured, DMARC is just one more TXT record. The real challenge is monitoring reports and maintaining alignment over time (something automation tools now make much easier).
If you haven’t implemented these yet, here’s the practical path most organizations follow:
Publish an SPF record. Identify every service that sends mail for your domain and list them in your SPF record. Example:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net -all
Enable DKIM signing.
Most mail services (like Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, or SendGrid) offer DKIM setup wizards that generate the public key for your DNS.
Add a DMARC record.
Start in monitoring mode to collect data safely:
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@yourdomain.com
Monitor and adjust.
Review your reports for a few weeks, ensure all legitimate sources are authenticated, then tighten your policy to quarantine
and eventually to reject
.
The process doesn’t have to be completed overnight. A gradual rollout minimizes risk while steadily improving protection.
In early 2024, Google and Yahoo announced new sender requirements aimed at reducing spam and phishing across their platforms. These rules affect any domain that sends large volumes of email, particularly marketing, transactional, or newsletter messages.
At their core, these new policies make DMARC enforcement mandatory for bulk senders.
Here’s a summary of what the two providers now require:
Publish a valid SPF and DKIM record. Every domain used for sending email must have both authentication mechanisms in place; not just one.
Implement DMARC with at least a “none” policy. Google and Yahoo require all bulk senders (typically defined as 5,000+ messages per day) to publish a DMARC record at the domain level. Example:
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@yourdomain.com
Even a “monitor-only” policy (p=none
) satisfies the baseline requirement — but both providers recommend moving toward quarantine
or reject
for full protection.
Align “From” and authenticated domains. Messages must use a domain in the “From” header that matches (or aligns with) the one authenticated by SPF or DKIM. Mismatched domains are more likely to be rejected.
Provide easy unsubscribe options. Google and Yahoo also mandate a one-click unsubscribe link in commercial messages and require that unsubscribe requests be honored within two days.
Maintain a low spam rate. Senders must keep their spam complaint rate under 0.3%, according to Google Postmaster Tools metrics.
Even if you’re not a “bulk sender,” if your messages go to Gmail or Yahoo Mail implementing these standards isn’t optional anymore; it’s table stakes.
Once you comply, your messages are far more likely to reach inboxes consistently.
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are not competing technologies; they’re complementary parts of one system.
When combined, they transform email from a vulnerable, easily faked channel into one of the most trustworthy forms of digital communication available.
And while each record is simple enough to publish, maintaining visibility and making sense of the resulting data can quickly become complex, especially when multiple vendors, subdomains, and external services are involved.
That’s where automation and analytics make all the difference.
Setting up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC correctly is just the beginning. The real challenge comes afterward - interpreting DMARC reports, detecting unauthorized sources, and maintaining alignment as your email infrastructure evolves.
DMARCeye is designed to make that process effortless. It translates raw XML reports into intuitive dashboards that show, at a glance, who’s sending mail on your behalf and whether they’re passing authentication.
With DMARCeye, you can:
Whether you manage a single domain or hundreds, DMARCeye gives you the visibility and control needed to keep your organization’s email safe, without diving into complex raw data.
Get a free trial of DMARCeye today and start protecting your email domain.