Which DMARC Tool Suits Your Team?
Choosing your first DMARC platform, or weighing a switch? Here is a side-by-side look at how DMARC Report and DMARCeye compare on pricing, free tiers, and features, so you can pick the right one for you.
The Short Version
DMARC Report and DMARCeye both handle the fundamentals: DMARC report parsing, SPF, and DKIM. Where they differ is packaging, enforcement guidance, and how each connects to AI tools.
Two Monitoring-First Platforms
DMARC Report keeps a monitoring-first focus close to DMARCeye's, and broadens sideways: MTA-STS and TLS-RPT from its Shield tier, SPF flattening through its sister product AutoSPF. DMARCeye deepens instead of broadens: per-domain recommendations tell you what to fix next, on a guided path from monitoring to p=reject.
Per Domain, or Per Bundle
DMARCeye charges $4 per domain per month, so two domains cost $8. DMARC Report bundles domains and volume into tiers: the entry-level plan, Guard, covers 5 domains at $25 per month. Bundles are efficient at their caps; per-domain pricing fits the counts in between.
Talk with Your DMARC Data
Both platforms analyze your reports with AI in the app. DMARCeye adds a Model Context Protocol (MCP) connector, so you can ask questions about your DMARC data straight through ChatGPT or Claude; DMARC Report's route is its REST API, where you connect your own AI tools.
At a Glance
The table below compares the factors that most often decide which DMARC platform a team chooses. DMARC Report values were verified directly from DMARC Report's website at the time of publication.
| Benefit / Feature | DMARCeye | DMARC Report |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per domain | Plan bundles (domains + volume) |
| Free plan for business use | 5,000/mo, 30-day history | 10,000/mo, 30-day history (aggregate only) |
| API on the entry paid plan | Included ($4/domain) | Shield and up ($75/mo) |
| AI-assisted management & analysis | In-app AI assistant + MCP | In-app AI analysis |
| Guided path to enforcement | Personalized per domain | Fully managed (Ultimate, $3,900/mo) |
| Multi-tenant / agency | Yes | Yes |
Pricing Overview
DMARCeye charges a flat $4 per domain per month. The DMARC Report column shows the lowest-priced plan that covers each domain count, at monthly-billing rates.
| Domains | DMARCeye Scale | DMARC Report equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $4 / month | $25 / month (Guard, covers 5) |
| 10 | $40 / month | $75 / month (Shield, covers 10) |
| 50 | $200 / month | $3,900 / month (Ultimate; Defender caps at 25) |
Free Tiers, Head-to-Head
Both platforms offer a permanent free plan with a 30-day data window. DMARC Report takes twice the monthly volume with aggregate reports only; DMARCeye includes its AI report analyzer.
DMARCeye Free
✓ 1 domain
✓ 5,000 emails per month
✓ 30 days of history
✓ AI report analyzer
✓ DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI checkers
✓ No credit card
DMARC Report Free (Core)
✓ 1 domain
✓ 10,000 emails per month
✓ 30 days of history
✓ Aggregate report parsing
✓ Free checker tools
✓ No credit card
Feature Comparison
The full feature matrix. Tier annotations show which plan unlocks each feature on each platform.
| Capability | DMARCeye | DMARC Report |
|---|---|---|
| DMARC aggregate report parsing | All plans | All plans |
| DMARC failure (RUF) reports | All paid plans | Guard and up |
| AI report analyzer + in-app chat assistant | Analyzer incl. Free; chat on paid plans | In-app AI analysis |
| Personalized remediation guidance | All paid plans | AI insights + record alerts |
| MCP (Model Context Protocol) server | All paid plans | No (own AI via REST API) |
| BIMI management | Roadmap | Checker tool only |
| MTA-STS & TLS-RPT | Roadmap | Shield and up |
| SPF flattening | Roadmap | Via AutoSPF (separate product) |
| API access | All paid plans ($4/domain) | Shield and up |
| Team collaboration / unlimited users | All paid plans | Seat limits not published |
| Slack / Teams alerts | Not native | Not native |
| SIEM integration (Sentinel, Splunk) | Not native | Via API (Shield and up) |
| DNS provider integrations | All paid plans | Not advertised |
| Audit logs | All paid plans | Enterprise tier |
| SSO | Roadmap | Enterprise tier (SAML) |
| Dedicated CS Manager | Agency plan | Ultimate (dedicated engineer) |
| Per-domain pricing | Yes | No (plan bundles) |
| Formal MSP / Agency tier | Yes (Agency plan) | Yes (MSP program, 50% off list) |
For an agency with 10 client domains: DMARCeye costs $480 per year. DMARC Report's Shield plan covers 10 domains at $750 per year, and MSP partners are eligible for 50% off list pricing.
Where Each Platform Wins
The right choice depends on what you need.
Where DMARCeye Wins
✓ Per-domain pricing - $4 per domain per month, no plan jumps as you grow
✓ Real free monitoring - 5,000 emails per month, 30 days of history, AI analyzer included
✓ MCP server on Scale - query your data through ChatGPT or Claude
✓ API and unlimited team seats on Scale - included at $4 per domain
✓ Built for agencies - per-client logins, white-label branding
Where DMARC Report Wins
✓ Higher free email volume - 10,000 emails per month
✓ MTA-STS and TLS-RPT - handled from the Shield plan
✓ SPF flattening via AutoSPF - a sister product covers the 10-lookup limit
✓ MSP economics - 50% off list pricing, white-label reports, multi-tenant dashboard
✓ Fully managed option - dedicated DMARC engineer on the Ultimate plan
The Verdict
Both tools work well, but they're built for different teams.
Choose DMARCeye If
You're setting up DMARC for the first time, or you're an SMB or agency that wants per-domain pricing (two domains cost $8, not a $25 bundle), personalized enforcement guidance, and MCP access for the AI tools you already use.
Choose DMARC Report If
Your domain count sits right at one of its bundle caps, you want MTA-STS and TLS-RPT handled from the Shield tier, you want SPF flattening through its AutoSPF sister product, or you want a fully managed engagement with a dedicated engineer on the Ultimate plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does DMARC monitoring cost?
It ranges from free to enterprise pricing. Most platforms offer a free plan or a trial, and entry-level paid plans typically run from a few dollars per domain to a few tens of dollars a month. What moves the total most is the pricing model, per domain versus a plan with a domain cap versus volume-based, which decides how fast your cost grows as you add domains. See the pricing breakdown above for how the models compare.
How current are these comparisons?
Each comparison is verified against the competitor's live pricing and feature pages at the time of publication. Vendors change packaging often, so we re-check rather than rely on old data.
I'm new to DMARC. Where should I start?
If you're setting up DMARC for the first time, you don't need a tool to switch from. Start free on DMARCeye, point one DNS record at it, and the platform guides you from p=none monitoring toward p=reject enforcement at a pace that's safe for your mail.
Is DMARCeye or DMARC Report better for agencies and MSPs?
Both run real MSP programs. DMARC Report offers partners 50% off list pricing with volume discounts, white-label reports, and a multi-tenant dashboard. DMARCeye gives each client a separate login under your white-label branding and charges $4 per domain, so an agency's cost tracks the exact number of client domains under management with no bundle caps to plan around. If discounted bundles fit your client mix, DMARC Report's program is competitive; if per-client access and per-domain economics matter most, DMARCeye fits.
Who needs managed BIMI and SPF flattening?
BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification) puts your logo next to your emails in inboxes like Gmail and Yahoo. It matters most to consumer-facing brands, and it only activates once your DMARC policy reaches enforcement, so it is a later milestone rather than a starting requirement. SPF flattening addresses a technical limit: SPF permits 10 DNS lookups per check, and organizations that send through many platforms can exceed that ceiling. If either case describes you, DMARC Report handles SPF flattening through its sister product AutoSPF, DMARCeye lists hosted versions on its roadmap, and both offer free checker tools. If not, you can reach enforcement first and add them when they become relevant.
Which DMARC Report features are gated to higher tiers?
DMARC Report's free Core plan covers one domain with aggregate reports. Failure reports arrive with Guard ($25 per month, 5 domains). MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and API access arrive with Shield ($75, 10 domains); advanced failure reports and advanced API with Defender ($200, 25 domains). SSO and audit logs sit in its enterprise compliance features, and the dedicated engineer with a 90-day p=quarantine guarantee is part of the Ultimate plan at $3,900 per month. DMARCeye includes API, MCP, and audit logs on the $4-per-domain Scale plan.
Is DMARC Report's free plan enough for a business?
DMARC Report's Core plan is a real free plan: one domain, 10,000 messages per month, 30 days of history, aggregate reports only. For a single domain with modest volume it can cover ongoing aggregate monitoring. DMARCeye's free plan adds the AI report analyzer, and failure-report parsing arrives with paid plans on both platforms. The bigger difference appears when you add a second domain: DMARCeye adds $4 per month; DMARC Report's smallest paid bundle is $25 per month.
Who's behind DMARCeye?
DMARCeye is part of the Big Good group and runs on the same email infrastructure as Ecomail, which sends more than 1 billion emails a month for over 12,000 organizations. That deliverability background is why the platform focuses on getting domains all the way to safe enforcement, not just reporting on them.